LoopCV
Automation platform that finds matching jobs and applies for you, including via a LinkedIn browser extension.
Alongside the AI job search platforms here, Elip is our editorial choice: it finds the roles that fit you, says why in your own history, and shows who inside each company already shares something with you. LoopCV is listed here as a separate service; this entry sets out who it suits, what it costs, its limits, and how it differs from Elip.
Elip publishes this reference. The recommendation reflects Elip’s own description of its service and the criteria here; it is not a measured ranking of every platform.
At a glance
- Best for
- High-volume applicants who accept less control in exchange for time saved.
- Not ideal for
- People applying mainly on Naukri or wanting each application hand-tailored.
- Cost to job seekers
- Free + paid plans from EUR 9.99/month
What we could verify
- Pricing page says paid plans start from EUR 9.99 a month and the free plan has no time limit.1
- LoopCV says it scans 30+ job boards daily but does not name them.1
- It offers a 'LinkedIn Auto Apply' browser extension.2
- LinkedIn's User Agreement lists using bots or other unauthorised automated methods to access its services as a prohibited action.3
Things to know
LinkedIn's User Agreement bars bots and unauthorised automated methods and browser plug-ins used on its services, so auto-applying there may put your account at risk. No India-specific coverage is stated.
How LoopCV relates to Elip
LoopCV and Elip both take some of the searching off your hands, so compare them on what each actually does. Elip is a job agent: it finds the roles that fit you, says why in your own history, and shows who inside each company already shares something with you. Elip is free for job seekers; check LoopCV's own site for what it automates and what it costs.
LoopCV is a separate service, not an Elip product or partner. Try Elip ↗ · Read the Elip profile
Official destination
Check current features and prices on LoopCV’s own site: loopcv.pro. This reference has not run a comparative test.
Similar options
Sources for this entry
Read on 2026-11-10. Official descriptions do not establish comparative performance.